ElectricMotorcycleForum.com

  • May 18, 2024, 11:57:33 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - BrianTRice@gmail.com

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Greg Hassler runs the online parser, which had stopped working a few months ago while he tried upgrading the core parser code to the latest Python I'd been working on while in surgery recovery.


This weekend, we figured out the problem and got the latest code deployed:
http://home.hasslers.net/zerologparser/log_parser.php


So, this is now working as intended again, with updated README instructions. See the original code (which now requires Python 3 vs Python 2 previously) if you want to run it yourself:
https://github.com/zero-motorcycle-community/zero-log-parser/


I have a better framework in place for testing and rolling out new changes to the parser, which has always been a challenge, because the test inputs are log files that belong to owners, which we don't republish or even use without permission. The test harness in that repository works for whatever logs you have on hand, then.


If you have a log file that the parser chokes on, we would love it if you let us know which file it was so we can add it to our test collection.


I believe that the 2017+ model year log header is now mostly passing, but still needs further tweaks. For SRF/SRS logs, there is a totally new format and no examples of decoded logs, so although I've worked out some basics, I need to roll out actual code to expose the contents to owners in a reasonable way.

2
This was livestreamed this afternoon. I noticed about 15 minutes in and watched it fully:
-


The audience questions were all typical (and good, just easy for me to predict having been in this space for a few years), and I think his answers were mostly helpful.
- He did dance around battery research, aside from sensibly downplaying supercapacitors and graphite engineering changes, since they aren't production ready. I wonder what he was avoiding saying, although he did admit they're lagging a bit in their regular density updates.
- He highlighted the change in Zero marketing from being a purely budgetary/rational decision to an emotion-first message, which sounds pretty sensible to me (use the budgetary analysis to justify buying the bike you like, rather than expecting you to like a bike with a specific spreadsheet outcome).
- He definitely stuck with a line I've heard before and used, which is that to get the bike price down, the battery price and scale are the key factors; he later discussed how production scaling in the last year has been a nice problem to have, but sort of hinted that it's scary not being able to get the bikes out fast enough once the market comes to your door (so to speak).


I'm an adventure-ish rider but I don't find the Black Forest as compelling as some, apparently. I want to solve range/aerodynamics before trying to get out there fully.


Anyway, that's what I got out of an hour's discussion.

3
I've written some data processing code to try to take Zero's parts listings and add metadata to them and emit some listings on the unofficial manual.


The output pages, currently, are listed here and are highly subject to deletion and re-organizing. Do not link to them expecting them to be stable yet.


https://zeromanual.com/wiki/Category:GeneratedPartsPage


I'm looking for comments about the structure and usefulness of these pages.


I know for example that I'm not listing prices, and I'm not sure that I can reasonably do that, so don't expect that I'll just add them because you want them. The unofficial manual isn't a dealer and doesn't have an official license for this data, so I'm publishing this under Fair Use / Derivative Work claims and will likely add a real disclaimer to this section of the website to avoid trouble.


I also know that the way the articles are carved up is a little troublesome. I can recombine the pages into larger ones, and can even merge the tables, but I'm unsure how useful that would be.


I also know that there are typo issues and some mangled text in there, as a result of the complicated method by which I extract the text from the parts catalog documents. There's a professional process of data cleaning to improve on here, which just will take me time to get right. It took a while to make the output this clean.


I have a few thoughts about how this might go in general, which might be the right food for thought for you to provide feedback on:
- Each part number might get its own page (huge number of pages, but leaves rooms for people to comment and makes it easy to link to/between part numbers).
- The "component" articles could each include the relevant parts listing table.
- Indexing articles by part type (bolts, brackets, etc).
- Splitting the articles back into per-model-year articles (mirrors the original structure but that makes it harder to track changes across years and models which is what I'm trying to do here).


The nice part is that the program that generates these pages can wipe these clean and start over to generate something else. But that's why I'm asking aloud for feedback.

4
Cross-post from FB: https://www.facebook.com/groups/zmcowners/permalink/2845943378808185/

Greg Hassler just posted a YouTube video guide to rear shock removal for Gen2 (DS/DSR specifically) models!


The unofficial manual has a rough guide for this procedure, but the video definitely highlights some not-so-subtle challenges with this task. I’ve added to the article and will work on updating the text as appropriate soon.
 https://zeromanual.com/wiki/Rear_Shock_Removal

5
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / SR/S official owners manual available
« on: March 14, 2020, 04:37:19 AM »
Only the English translation is published so far:
https://www.zeromotorcycles.com/owner-resources/

http://media.zeromotorcycles.com/resources/owners-manuals/2020/2020-Zero-Owners-Manual-SRS.pdf


Unlike SDS and XMX platform bikes, the manuals for the SR/F and SR/S models are distinct documents, even though they obviously share a lot in common.


I have some tools to help discover differences in the PDFs, which I'll use soon and might highlight interesting differences. But I'm a little under the weather with painkillers, so I might not deliver promptly.

6
Now, this is relatively premature, but I've embarked on making a manual for the SRF owners and upcoming SRS owners. Honestly, I intend to be an SRS owner, but I'm not ready for a new bike because I still have some surgery that will keep me at home for another few weeks. I've amassed enough photos and documentation that I can try to make a reasonable manual to start with.


So, here's the main document:
https://zeromanual.com/wiki/FST_Platform/Unofficial_Service_Manual
And here's the full listing of articles:
https://zeromanual.com/wiki/FST_Platform


I'm going to start with just focusing on the structure and layout of the bikes, and the logic of working with them. It's going to be light on the deep technical stuff for a while until I can get hands-on with one, of course, but hopefully someone I can visit a nearby (SF Bay Area) owner soon to poke around (volunteers are welcome to message or email me).


Keep your expectations low, please, because it took about a year for the original manual to become truly useful (2016-2017 timeframe) and another year for me to rework the site to support all these different models and configurations over the years, without duplicating big chunks of content about the battery and so on. On the other hand, I know way more about Zero and bike hardware than I did a few years ago, just as an outcome of the interview and learning process developing the site.


If you can give me an idea of what would be important to see first, I'd appreciate that, in terms of broad goals. Remember also that you, too, can contribute and I'd like to see that happen again now that I'm done wrangling the site so hard it seemed to confuse contributors (although no one did any bad edits at all).

7
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Zero Log Parsing for 2017+ models
« on: February 22, 2020, 12:19:42 AM »
This is a technical assistance request for owners of Zero models in the S+DS and FX/FXS platforms made on or after 2017.


Background:
The unofficial log parser is a community project to help owners decode Zero logs. The code is at:
https://github.com/zero-motorcycle-community/zero-log-parser/
and the service that uses it is at:
http://home.hasslers.net/zerologparser/


There is a format change that Zero introduced to the log header, currently documented as a bug:
https://github.com/zero-motorcycle-community/zero-log-parser/issues/15


I introduced a change recently to help address this, BUT we are missing files that help us understand how Zero decodes those logs, and this ultimately prevents us from a correct interpretation of those logs.


In this way, BTW, the unofficial log parser has become a victim of its own success, because it was built by emulating the output that Zero provides to owners when they share their logs with customer service. Because the unofficial log parser has become so commonplace to use and mostly correct, this process of correction stalled.


So, I'm looking for volunteers who can send me text-file logs that Zero has provided to them, NOT unofficial log parse text-file logs, so that we can compare and correct the unofficial log parser. Obviously, the original log (that ends in .bin) will also be helpful.


You can email me at (my forum handle) at gmail.com to avoid sharing it publicly and also to avoid forum attachment size limits.


Thanks!

8

So, after a ton of work I've been detailing in another thread, I created a rough and mostly-acceptable XMX (FX/FXS) manual in a few minutes!
For context: https://www.electricmotorcycleforum.com/boards/index.php?topic=9644


I copied the existing Unofficial Service Manual page content into a new page and rolled up sections with SDS/XMX splits to just handle XMX. I added a few new sections that don't exist yet for XMX parts and procedures.


I think overall this does highlight what I thought might arise as issues for XMX owners trying to use the manual for their own purposes, but now you can fill in new sections quickly without engaging in the large-scale edits I've had to manage myself.


Anyway, here it is, and I would like feedback or assistance from FX/FXS owners:
https://zeromanual.com/wiki/XMX_Platform/Unofficial_Service_Manual

9
General Discussion / EV battery degradation study summary
« on: December 18, 2019, 12:34:38 AM »

This is a remarkably well-presented study of several thousand EVs over time, with some charts.


Here are their summary recommendations, which align with what I've been hearing over the years from various manufacturers and engineers:
  • Avoid keeping your car sitting with a full or empty charge. Ideally, keep your SOC between 20-80% particularly when leaving it for longer periods, and only charge it fully for long distance trips.
  • Minimize fast charging (DCFC). Some high-use duty cycles will need a faster charge, but if your vehicle sits overnight, level 2 should be sufficient for the majority of your charging needs.
  • Climate is out of an operator’s control, but do what you can to avoid extreme hot temperatures, such as choosing shade when parked on hot days.
  • High-use is not a concern, so fleets shouldn’t hesitate to put them to work. An EV isn’t useful sitting idle in the fleet yard, and putting on more miles per vehicle is overall a better fleet management practice.
Links:

10
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / New Tool for logs: data export
« on: December 17, 2019, 01:38:43 AM »
In the course of working on a project, I realized I needed to finish an idea I've been hacking on for a while, to turn Zero logs into a tabular format that can be processed by commodity software into data visualizations and analytics.


Zero logs are just event sequences, so right now this is a bit rough: battery data only shows up on events from the BMS, and ride data are on separate events. So it doesn't plot easily yet, but the CSV/TSV formats are working well and I pull out all of the columns that Zero puts into "key: value key: value" sequences, and categorize the events and their attributes.



https://github.com/zero-motorcycle-community/zero-log-data-extractor


Here's some example output:

entry,timestamp,component,event_type,event,PackTemp (h),PackTemp (l),Vpack,BattAmps,MotTemp,AmbTemp,vmod,minsys,vcap,MinCell,PackSOC,MbbChgEn,serial,Error Code,Bmvolts,Amps
1,2018-05-21 21:12:20,MBB,,Disarmed,21,20,113.044,2,26,20,,,,,,,,,,
2,2018-05-13 10:06:37,Controller,,Sevcon CAN Link Down,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
3,2018-05-13 10:06:38,Controller,,Sevcon CAN Link Up,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
4,2018-05-13 10:06:40,MBB,,Contactor Welded,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
5,2018-05-13 10:06:40,Controller,OFF,Sevcon Turned Off,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
6,2018-05-13 10:06:42,Controller,ON,Sevcon Turned On,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
7,2018-05-13 10:06:42,Controller,,Sevcon CAN Link Down,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
8,2018-05-13 10:06:43,Controller,,Sevcon CAN Link Up,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9,2018-05-13 10:06:43,Controller,DEBUG,Sevcon Contactor Drive ON.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
10,2018-05-13 10:06:43,BMS,,Module 00,,,,,,,93.175,93.197,86.75,,,,,,,
11,2018-05-13 10:06:43,BMS,DEBUG,Module 00 Contactor is now Closed,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
12,2018-05-13 10:06:43,MBB,INFO, Enabling External Chg 0 Charger 2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
13,2018-05-13 10:10:25,MBB,DISCONNECTED,External Chg 0 Charger 2 Disconnected,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
14,2018-05-13 10:10:25,BMS,DEBUG,Module scheme changed from Charging mode to Stopped mode,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
15,2018-05-13 10:10:25,BMS,DEBUG,Module mode Change Does Not Require Disconnect,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
16,2018-05-13 10:10:32,BMS,DEBUG,Module scheme changed from Stopped mode to Running mode,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
17,2018-05-13 10:10:32,BMS,DEBUG,Module mode Change Does Not Require Disconnect,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
18,2018-05-13 10:10:35,MBB,RIDING,Riding,37,36,93.271,1,43,18,,,,,,,,,,
19,2018-05-13 10:10:35,MBB,,Batt Dischg Cur Limited,,,,,,,,,,3.28,,,,,,
20,2018-05-13 10:10:42,BMS,DEBUG,Module scheme changed from Running mode to Stopped mode,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
21,2018-05-13 10:10:42,BMS,DEBUG,Module mode Change Does Not Require Disconnect,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
22,2018-05-13 10:11:04,MBB,CONNECTED,External Chg 0 Charger 2 Connected,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
23,2018-05-13 10:11:04,BMS,DEBUG,Module scheme changed from Stopped mode to Charging mode,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
24,2018-05-13 10:11:04,BMS,DEBUG,Module mode Change Does Not Require Disconnect,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
25,2018-05-13 10:11:04,MBB,INFO, Disabling External Chg 0 Charger 2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
26,2018-05-13 10:11:05,MBB,INFO, Enabling External Chg 0 Charger 2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
27,2018-05-13 10:11:15,MBB,CHARGING,Charging,37,36,,-63,,,,,,,9%,Yes,,,,
28,2018-05-13 10:11:55,MBB,OFF,Key Off,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
29,2018-05-13 10:21:15,MBB,CHARGING,Charging,37,36,,-86,,,,,,,21%,Yes,,,,
30,2018-05-13 10:31:15,MBB,CHARGING,Charging,38,37,,-86,,,,,,,32%,Yes,,,,
31,2018-05-13 10:41:15,MBB,CHARGING,Charging,39,38,,-83,,,,,,,44%,Yes,,,,
32,2018-05-13 10:51:15,MBB,CHARGING,Charging,42,40,,-82,,,,,,,55%,Yes,,,,
33,2018-05-13 11:01:15,MBB,CHARGING,Charging,44,43,,-78,,,,,,,66%,Yes,,,,



What I'll try to do next is segment the data where there are charge sequences and ride sequences, so that the events are somewhat blended or interpolated. At the very least, each charge section and ride section could get an identifier so it's easier to extract one sequence and plot or analyze that, without writing a lot of time-range logic.


Any comments/suggestions?

11
Electric Motorcycle News / New BMW Concept: "E-Power Roadster"
« on: December 11, 2019, 01:02:54 AM »
Here's the story, with pretty good photos:
 https://riders.drivemag.com/news/meet-the-bmw-e-power-roadster-concept-200-nm-of-torque


Specs from a quick reading:
- 13kWh battery
- 134HP
- 200Nm (147ft-lbs) torque
- 260kg (573lbs) weight
- 160km/h top speed (limiter)
- DC charging (CCS probably) with ~1C rate.


They apparently won't ship until they can improve the range into the 200km-300km bracket (125mi to 185mi).

12
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Unofficial Manual changes and roadmap
« on: December 03, 2019, 05:37:05 AM »
This is just a general notice about the plan I'm intending to carry out, after months of gathering of notes, reading professional texts on technical writing, reviewing other motorcycle service manuals, and finally a very generous invitation to Zero headquarters to sit with the service team and go over the bike and its systems.

The unofficial manual's structure is a long and complex topic that's not really fit for a forum; I basically have to undertake an effort to keep it manageable, and unfortunately, I can't do this by committee, although I really want to make sure you can contribute. I intended to put out some polling about the ideas, but really the best feedback I can take will only happen once this effort is mostly complete, when people complain about how to find things, hopefully.

Problems
I intend to address the problems presented by having a new platform for the SR/F, which happen to reflect issues the manual has had covering the FX model's platform and the pre-2013 models.

So, the main problem with content around all of these motorcycle models is that they’re all different and yet share a lot. Some are different in small ways (FX vs FXS - same platform), and some are really big (SRF buswork and cabling are just hugely different from everything we’ve seen, mostly improved with some tradeoffs).

So far, I’ve just made a single-article service manual that is just gargantuan (700kb of HTML alone when I save it to disk). If I try making a PDF with my browser, about 60 pages are guaranteed (probably 80 pages with book-oriented formatting), and I’m sure it’d be a lot higher if I weren’t trying to keep that article from overloading my mobile phone browser when I need to look something up.

We have the same issue with the big aftermarket page, where some entries are for some platforms but not others, and you have to know the outline to figure out where to look.

And I’ll admit very easily that it’s hard to find things on the site. I’ve done my best to make the search bar work, but most people probably don’t realize it’s there or if they do, don’t trust it to work well. And I can never guess how someone’s going to think to themselves before looking.

Anyway, if I continue my current strategy and just jam in the SRF, it’s going to get totally out of control and confusing, and any further model just compounds that.

Solutions
First, I'm committing at least for now to not moving any of the current content around. This is difficult, but it means all the S/DS and X owners don’t have to follow the new content pattern until Google indexes it right and all of the front page gets sorted.

What I will do is to silently pull all the parts of the service manual into separate articles, and silently compose the service manual from those pages. I’ve been doing this for over a year, partly so I can load a single procedure onto my phone and use it in my garage. Here’s a directory of those procedure pages:
https://zeromanual.com/wiki/Category:Procedure

If you look at a procedure, sometimes you’ll get a variant of 2013-2014 bikes in there, or X vs SDS written out in different steps. Inserting SRF information in there is where this turns into trouble.

If I put the battery into a separate article, I’d have a similar problem.

So, there’s a technical part of this plan where I break out articles into separate composed articles that each might be specific to a platform or a series of years or such. I’ll probably have to use a lot of prefixes like “2013-2014”, “SDS”, or “XMX”. I settled in on "Gen1", "Gen2", and "Gen3" where something was shared between platforms.

So, here are some component pages to give an idea of how it will split out the manual:
https://zeromanual.com/wiki/Category:Component

Finally, there will be multiple service manuals, as required. Probably one for SDS, one for XMX, and one for FST, (or Gen1, Gen2, and Gen3!) and each will have areas of variation, but this is a practical decision to make these reasonable to read and not too large.

I’ll pull out the FST manual first, since that requires the least amount of work, and then I’ll cross-tie it with the existing content as necessary, and make articles that tie everything together across models as required. But eventually the FX and FXS will have their own manual, more or less. It won't be perfect, but it'll be easier to find things hopefully.

I think one big challenge will be making sure that owners know where to go from the front page. This is really difficult no matter how you slice it, and I'm not exactly clear on what I'll do, but it's definitely on my mind. I want users to use the search function, but right now this doesn't seem very common, for probably good reasons around the huge articles.

I'm not even sure what I want to ask from forum members. The wiki is designed so that you can contribute, which means adding pages, text, photos, etc., but I can't figure out how to share in the architecture planning, so I'll keep guiding it myself until someone steps up to collaborate at that level.

13
It seems like the SR/F analysis is pretty fast right now, so I'm making a separate topic just to track the technical knowledge and some observations. In particular, I'll also be tracking "unknowns" for the sake of soliciting owners to inspect their bikes for answers or ask dealers in case the new owner's manuals don't clarify matters.

First, here's press coverage and the specs page:
- https://electrek.co/2019/02/25/zero-sr-f-electric-motorcycle-launch/
- https://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/zero/exclusive-2019-zero-sr-f-review-first-ride.html
- https://www.zeromotorcycles.com/zero-srf/

Known:
- The Calex 1200 charger is gone. The underside of the bike has an air scoop now to direct air to the motor whose fins are now axial vs radial. Honestly, it seems like this can be removed if the motor isn't run at peak performance levels.
- Charging (onboard) is either one or two 3kW (15A @ L1 or L2) units laid horizontally above the main power pack. L1 charging requires an adapter.
- The bike includes a J1772 (or Mennekes?) inlet at the base of the tank near the seat. The cover opens upwards and the plug is oriented towards the side. Potentially, that cover could be susceptible to damage, or the inlet might get some weathering (just something to look out for).
- The tank storage bin includes a dual USB plug for phone/GPS/etc accessories.
- 12kW total L2 charging is available as an upgrade analogous to (if not identical to) the existing 6kW Charge Tank that replaces the tank storage bin.
- The Power Tank has been mentioned in reviews, but I haven't seen any Zero representative or page confirm that.
- The LCD display is replaced by a full-color TFT display.
- The bike seems to have better designed external plastic paneling, and is likely to have much better ingress shielding and management than the S/X platforms.

Unknown:
- The firmware is now labeled "Cypher III" which is a bizarre branding choice. Maybe we'll learn some day what I and II were. We don't know what the architectural diagrams imply yet. There's some IOT mentions which are worth evaluating on a number of levels (security, reliability, relationship of the bike to cloud services, ability to service equipment, ability to recover from a "brick" condition).
- The motor controller's position or model. There are no cooling fins under the tail as there were for Sevcon.
- The location of the 12V battery or related subsystems.
- The location of an accessory charging port or diagnostic ports.

Happily, the frame does seem much more amenable to supporting a fairing. Tubes are easier to brace to without (say) making a weld, and it seems like the bike is made in a way that allows greater precision in dimensions for third parties to build on.

I haven't mentioned the marquee feature-set like increased power, traction control, cornering ABS, cruise control, better ride modes, etc. but they all seem as advertised and will just require some hands-on evaluation to fill in whatever the official manual doesn't cover.

14
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Calex charger teardown report
« on: February 17, 2019, 05:29:44 AM »
Early last year (April 2018), my 2016 DSR's onboard charger (Calex / GreenWattPower EVC 1300), after 31000 miles. Prior to that, my DC-DC converter failed and I replaced it myself.

I had the money at the time to upgrade my DigiNow V1 tank installation to a V2 pan installation, and took the opportunity to disassemble the onboard charger for the benefit of the community, to understand the nature of at least one onboard failure, and hopefully shed light on other instances of this vexing problem.

I've published my findings to the unofficial manual wiki as a separate page. It is currently unlinked, because it's a touchy topic. https://zeromanual.com/wiki/Calex_Charger_Teardown

For what it's worth, I decided to disclose this because I hope (and predict without any confirmation other than inference from the teasers) that the coming SR/F model and its platform will no longer equip this Calex model. Also, I wanted to get this information out of my extensive private notes so that the knowledge would not go stale.

15
This is a review for Hollywood Electrics' sport touring fairing that fits 2014+ model year Zero's.
Disclaimer: I was discounted on the fairing price in exchange for creating installation documentation. I was already signed up to buy it, also generally in favor of supporting any vendor that makes a Zero-fitted product, and finally very much in favor of vendors who craft fairings for the Zero.
Electric Terry Hershner has been fielding this fairing for some time, with his own modifications to accommodate his dog, Charger, in the tank area. Terry’s efforts are impressive, of course, but I hope a review of my own might clear up what this fairing offers to the average rider.
Here's a reference install thread by a customer on their own: http://electricmotorcycleforum.com/boards/index.php?topic=8093
Here’s my initial review on the Facebook Zero owners group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/zmcowners/permalink/1668738283195373/
My overview:
  • This is a combined cockpit and sportbike half-fairing that is suitable for touring, in the way that a Honda VFR 800 is a sport-touring bike.

The cockpit features:
  • The instrument cluster, headlamp, and wiring are all projected forward 4 inches and fixed to the fairing instead of the forks.
  • This cleans up all that messy wiring arrangement and makes it easier to change a bulb or connect accessories.
  • I can actually see and read the dash while riding without feeling like I can’t see the damn road.
  • You can shade the instrument cluster from the sun as I’ve done with a smoke windscreen.

Airflow details:
  • The airflow is very good and clean. Just the right amount of low speed air comes up through the bottom at highway speeds, so there’s no buffeting around my helmet.
  • The windscreen is low but it’s forward of any windscreen we’ve been able to install on a Zero before. So unless you sit back with a Corbin seat, your head will be in airflow. But it will be clean air.
  • You can tuck behind the screen like a racer if you like. There’s more room than from the screens we’re used to.

Hardware details:
  • The main bracket has a boxy core with places to fasten wiring connectors so they’re all contained and easily arranged.
  • The brackets as a whole are extremely sturdy yet minimal. My cockpit doesn’t wobbly or rattle at all at any speed.

Accessorizing:
  • The windscreen opening matches bodywork for a 2015 Yamaha R1 so you have a reasonable set of ready windscreen options for under $100. I have a higher sport touring screen on the way for my highway needs.
  • There are hard supports for the windscreen fairing section that can support mirror stalks - still waiting to see and evaluate those but they’re sport-oriented. You can keep your stock mirrors as I have here but we should figure out various options. Bar-end mirrors work for a lot of people but my DS bars are already tricky in lanesplitting traffic.
Touring/range nerd section:
  • Drag/range benefit is at least 10%. Maybe 15% but YMMV literally because you always need to adjust such things to work with your body and riding style. It’s as good as my custom windscreen mounts.
  • If you don’t put mirrors where the stalks are intended, it may be easy to use them to mount a real touring windscreen with a slight offset bracket or spacers. Obviously I’m going to investigate this personally.
  • I think I can use this to help mount a second version of my dustbin fairing.
Overall, I’m very pleased and got to think through the install and see some of their development and design process which was impressive in its persistence and crafting.
Making fairings and brackets with appeal to more than one person is incredibly difficult and I think this strikes a balance you could use to build various looks you might be interested in even if this or the other installs don’t quite charm you.
I think we should encourage each other to invest in these fairings to make our Zero’s have a more stylish and impressive look, and to get a standard set of brackets in circulation. One-offs are gratifying but we need a fairing that makes our bikes attractive.
I’ll say on top of this that I finally got a Power Tank with cells matching my 2016 and my highway range seems to stabilize around 135 miles. Which feels really awesome. I want 150 miles of highway range this year and will do my damnedest to get it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5